<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Slams Apple &amp; AT&amp;T, Asks : Why Was Google Voice iPhone App Rejected?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Board Member Arthur Levinson Ditches GOOG, Stays At Apple &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Board Member Arthur Levinson Ditches GOOG, Stays At Apple &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>[...] resigned from Apple’s board and then that legendary Google-Voice iPhone App rejection happened (FCC is still investigating over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] resigned from Apple’s board and then that legendary Google-Voice iPhone App rejection happened (FCC is still investigating over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google-FCC-AT&#38;T Caught In A Love Triangle! Reason? Sex Lines &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Google-FCC-AT&#38;T Caught In A Love Triangle! Reason? Sex Lines &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>[...] AT&amp;T, Google-Voice story is back with a bang. If you guys remember few days back AT&amp;T had written to FCC &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AT&amp;T, Google-Voice story is back with a bang. If you guys remember few days back AT&amp;T had written to FCC &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google &#38; Verizon Announce The Android Deal, Team Up Against &#8216;Apple-AT&#38;T&#8217;? [Updated] &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Google &#38; Verizon Announce The Android Deal, Team Up Against &#8216;Apple-AT&#38;T&#8217;? [Updated] &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>[...] killer” Google-Voice. Apple earlier rejected Google-Voice and the rest is well&#8230; a long long long long stroy! Today Verizon CEO openly supported Google-Voice stating (in press-conference) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] killer” Google-Voice. Apple earlier rejected Google-Voice and the rest is well&#8230; a long long long long stroy! Today Verizon CEO openly supported Google-Voice stating (in press-conference) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Confirms that Apple Rejected Google Voice Application</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Confirms that Apple Rejected Google Voice Application</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-837</guid>
		<description>[...] told FCC that they haven&#8217;t rejected the Google Voice App and they are still pondering on it. FCC had launched an inquiry and asked the three parties involved- Apple, Google and AT&amp;T to respond to the reasons that let to the rejection of Google Voice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told FCC that they haven&#8217;t rejected the Google Voice App and they are still pondering on it. FCC had launched an inquiry and asked the three parties involved- Apple, Google and AT&amp;T to respond to the reasons that let to the rejection of Google Voice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple, AT&#38;T And Google Responds To FCC's Questions About Google Voice App Rejection &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple, AT&#38;T And Google Responds To FCC's Questions About Google Voice App Rejection &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] the three parties have responded to FCC&#8217;s letter probing into the rejection of Google Voice iPhone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the three parties have responded to FCC&#8217;s letter probing into the rejection of Google Voice iPhone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJT09</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>KJT09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-133</guid>
		<description>You are all morons.  AT&amp;T asked Apple to reject it because that would allow AT&amp;T customers to pay only for 3G bandwidth and no actual phone plan.  AT&amp;T would stand to lose billions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all morons.  AT&amp;T asked Apple to reject it because that would allow AT&amp;T customers to pay only for 3G bandwidth and no actual phone plan.  AT&amp;T would stand to lose billions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google CEO Eric Schmidt Resigns From Apple&#8217;s Board; What&#8217;s next? &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Google CEO Eric Schmidt Resigns From Apple&#8217;s Board; What&#8217;s next? &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] have been unfolding for the past 1 month – Google Chrome OS then Apple rejecting Google Apps then FCC’s enquiry in to the matter. I am wondering what Steve must have said to Eric, in a typical Godfather style “This is not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been unfolding for the past 1 month – Google Chrome OS then Apple rejecting Google Apps then FCC’s enquiry in to the matter. I am wondering what Steve must have said to Eric, in a typical Godfather style “This is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Agarwal</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-125</guid>
		<description>@FHierro : totally agree

@kmk : FCC is no moron, it is just trying to esquire the reason behind the rejection and the what policies does the app store follow in approval/rejection. You need to follow some rule and cant just reject any app with out reason... if that reason is competition then say that, if that reason is AT&amp;T then let the world know about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FHierro : totally agree</p>
<p>@kmk : FCC is no moron, it is just trying to esquire the reason behind the rejection and the what policies does the app store follow in approval/rejection. You need to follow some rule and cant just reject any app with out reason&#8230; if that reason is competition then say that, if that reason is AT&amp;T then let the world know about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmk</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>kmk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-124</guid>
		<description>@FHierro

you are moron! and FCC too. 

Which company has allowed competitors app in their device in the past?

Will Google allow MS Office Online on Google&#039;s site or on Android device?

idiots idiots! FCC is wasting tax payer&#039;s money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FHierro</p>
<p>you are moron! and FCC too. </p>
<p>Which company has allowed competitors app in their device in the past?</p>
<p>Will Google allow MS Office Online on Google&#8217;s site or on Android device?</p>
<p>idiots idiots! FCC is wasting tax payer&#8217;s money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FHierro</title>
		<link>http://techdusts.com/2009/08/02/fcc-slams-apple-att-asks-why-was-google-voice-iphone-app-rejected/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>FHierro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdusts.com/?p=531#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Cool! I hope it to be the beginning of the end of Apple&#039;s injustices and non-fulfillment of the contracts stablished with the developers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I hope it to be the beginning of the end of Apple&#8217;s injustices and non-fulfillment of the contracts stablished with the developers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

